Abstract
- Concise, Polished Mathematical Argument explaining the validity of Mathematical Statement to skeptic
- There are many Proof Methods
Direct Proof
- Is difficult when the thing we want to proof has an absence of a form like Irrationality of a number, which is number that does
Proof by Deduction (演绎推理)
- Direct Proof
- Used when the number of cases is infinite
- Use Theorem & Axioms to proof something
- Usually takes the form of - To show that every element of a set satisfies a certain property, suppose x is a particular but arbitrarily chosen element of the set, and show that x satisfies the property
Example
- Prove that the sum of any two even integers is even
- Prove the sum of any two rational numbers is rational
Proof by Exhaustion/Brute-force/Cases
- List down all the possible cases and check on all cases
- Useful there is a handful of possible cases
Proof by Construction/Example
- A form of Direct Proof
- For Existential, we can proof by providing an example that fulfil the conditions
Indirect Proof (反证法)
- When Direct Proof is hard to derive, we can try indirect proof
Proof by Counterexample (反例法)
- An example that shows that a Mathematical Statement isn’t always true. Useful for Universal
Proof by Contradiction (矛盾证明法)
- Indirect Proof
- Proof the negation is true to proof the given Mathematical Proof false, vice versa
- Useful when it is hard to use Direct Proof, where the negated Mathematical Statement has form to proof
Example
- Theorem 4.6.1
- Proof square root of 2 is irrational
Proof by Contraposition (逆否命证明法)
- Use when the Contrapositive (逆否命题) is easier to proof
Terminologies
Concise
- There is no irrelevant details
Polished
- Should be the final drift
Without Loss Of Generality (WLOG)
- Used before an assumption in a proof which narrows the premise to some special case
- And implies that proof for that case can be easily applied to all other cases
- To remove very similar proof, for example,
a
&b
are two consecutive odd number. We need to proof the product of the 2 consecutive odd numbers is always odd - we need to proof it correct for both
a<b
&b<a
cases, we can remove proof for one of the cases usingWLOG